Discectomy vs. Disc Replacement Surgery: Key Differences
When people are facing spinal disc problems, they often encounter medical terminology that can be confusing and overwhelming. Two procedures that are frequently discussed—discectomy and disc replacement—are sometimes mistakenly thought to be the same or similar procedures. However, these are fundamentally different surgical approaches with distinct goals, techniques, and outcomes. In this article we explore the differences between these procedures, which is crucial for making informed decisions about spinal care.
Discectomy Surgery
A discectomy is a surgical procedure designed to remove all or part of a damaged intervertebral disc that is causing pressure on spinal nerves. The primary goal of this procedure is decompression—relieving pressure on compressed nerve roots to alleviate pain, numbness, and weakness that typically radiates down the arms or legs.
During a discectomy, the surgeon typically removes only the herniated or damaged portion of the disc, though in some cases the entire disc may need to be removed. The procedure can be performed through various approaches, including traditional open surgery or minimally invasive techniques such as microdiscectomy, which uses smaller incisions and specialized instruments.
Types of Discectomy Procedures
Microdiscectomy is considered the most common spinal surgery and produces the most reliable outcomes for lumbar herniated discs. This minimally invasive approach uses an operating microscope and specialized instruments to remove the problematic disc material through a small incision, typically resulting in faster recovery times and reduced tissue trauma.
Traditional open discectomy involves a larger incision and is performed under general anesthesia. The surgeon may first perform a laminectomy, removing a small portion of bone to access the affected disc, and then remove the herniated material pressing on the nerve.
Disc Replacement Surgery
Disc replacement surgery, also known as artificial disc replacement (ADR) or total disc arthroplasty, is a procedure that involves removing a damaged disc and replacing it with an artificial prosthetic disc. Unlike discectomy, which focuses primarily on decompression, disc replacement aims to maintain spinal mobility while addressing the underlying disc pathology.
The artificial disc is designed to mimic the function of a natural disc, allowing for continued movement and flexibility in the spine. This procedure represents a newer surgical option that aims to preserve motion in the cervical or lumbar spine while alleviating symptoms associated with degenerative disc disease.
Goals of Disc Replacement
The primary advantage of artificial disc replacement over other spinal procedures is that it preserves motion and mobility in the spine. This is particularly important for patients who want to maintain active lifestyles and not just achieve pain relief. The preservation of natural spinal movement can also potentially reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease, a condition where discs above or below a fused segment experience accelerated degeneration.
Key Differences between Discectomy and Disc Replacement
Surgical approach and technique
While both procedures involve removing damaged disc material, their approaches differ significantly. In a discectomy, only the problematic portion of the disc is typically removed, leaving the remaining disc structure intact when possible. In contrast, disc replacement requires complete removal of the damaged disc, which is then replaced with an artificial prosthetic device.
Spinal mobility preservation
The most significant difference between these procedures lies in their impact on spinal mobility. Discectomy procedures, particularly when combined with spinal fusion surgery (such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, or ACDF), result in some loss of movement at the treated spinal segment. The fusion eliminates potentially painful movement by encouraging adjacent vertebrae to grow together over time.
Disc replacement surgery, however, is specifically designed to maintain natural neck or back movement post-surgery. The artificial disc allows for continued flexion, extension, and rotation at the treated level, which can be crucial for maintaining quality of life and preventing complications at adjacent spinal levels.
Recovery time and process
Recovery times for these procedures also differ notably. Recovery from cervical artificial disc replacement is typically about one month faster than cervical fusion procedures. For lumbar procedures, artificial disc replacement often requires an overnight hospital stay, while many discectomy procedures can be performed on an outpatient basis.
Candidate selection criteria
The choice between discectomy and disc replacement depends on several factors, including the specific nature of the disc problem as well as the patient’s age, activity level, and overall spinal health. Discectomy is often the preferred choice for cases where disc herniation is the primary issue and the remaining disc structure is relatively healthy.
Disc replacement is typically considered for patients with degenerative disc disease where the entire disc is compromised but the surrounding spinal structures remain stable. Age restrictions often apply to disc replacement candidates, as younger patients are generally better candidates for this procedure due to their longer life expectancy and higher activity demands.
Success rates and outcomes
Both procedures have demonstrated high success rates in appropriate candidates, though their success metrics differ. Discectomy procedures, particularly microdiscectomy, show excellent results for relieving radicular pain (pain that radiates down arms or legs) caused by nerve compression. Success rates for relieving leg pain from herniated discs typically range from 85–95 percent in properly selected candidates.
Disc replacement surgery has shown comparable success rates for pain relief while providing the additional benefit of maintained spinal mobility. Long-term studies have demonstrated that artificial disc replacement can provide sustained pain relief and functional improvement while preserving motion at the treated level.
When Each Procedure Is Recommended
Discectomy
Discectomy is typically recommended when conservative treatments such as physical therapy, medications, and injections have failed to provide adequate relief from symptoms caused by disc herniation. Ideal candidates for discectomy include patients with:
- Clear evidence of nerve compression from herniated disc material
- Radicular pain that correlates with imaging findings
- Failed conservative treatment for 6–12 weeks (unless progressive neurological deficits are present)
- Good overall health status for surgery
Disc replacement
Disc replacement is generally considered for patients with degenerative disc disease who meet specific criteria. Candidates for artificial disc replacement typically have:
- Single or two-level degenerative disc disease
- Preserved spinal alignment and stability
- Adequate bone quality
- Age typically between 18–60 years
- Absence of significant arthritis in spinal joints
- Good overall health and realistic expectations
Potential Risks and Complications
Both procedures carry surgical risks, though the specific risk profiles differ. Discectomy procedures, being generally less invasive, typically carry lower overall risk. Common risks include infection, bleeding, dural tears, and incomplete pain relief. The risk of recurrent disc herniation exists, though it occurs in less than 10 percent of cases.
Disc replacement surgery, requiring greater access to the spine than standard procedures, carries slightly higher risks. These may include device malfunction, loosening, or wear over time. Additionally, the approach to the spine required for disc replacement, particularly in the lumbar region, can pose risks to major blood vessels and organs.
Making the Right Choice
The decision between discectomy and disc replacement should always be made in consultation with a qualified spine surgeon who can evaluate the patient’s individual circumstances. Both procedures offer effective solutions for different types of disc problems, and neither is inherently superior to the other. The key is matching the right procedure to the right patient. Patients should feel comfortable asking their surgeons about the rationale for recommending one procedure over another and should understand the expected outcomes, recovery process, and long-term implications of their choice.
Understanding that discectomy and disc replacement are distinct procedures with different goals and outcomes is the first step in making an informed decision. While both can provide significant relief from disc-related pain and symptoms, their approaches to achieving this relief differ fundamentally, making careful consideration of individual circumstances essential for optimal outcomes.
Even though discectomy surgery is a common and generally quite successful procedure, a hole is frequently left in the outer wall of the disc. In fact, patients with these large holes in their discs are more than twice as likely to reinjure themselves by having what is known as a reherniation. These reherniations often require additional surgery or even fusions. Fortunately, there is a new treatment specifically designed to close the large holes that are often left in spinal discs after discectomy surgery. Barricaid is a bone-anchored device proven to reduce reherniations, and 95 percent of Barricaid patients did not undergo a reoperation due to reherniation in a 2-year study timeframe. This treatment is done immediately following the discectomy—during the same operation—and does not require any additional incisions or time in the hospital.
If you have any questions about the Barricaid treatment or how to get access to Barricaid, ask your doctor or contact us today.
For full benefit/risk information, please visit: https://www.barricaid.com/instructions.
Comments